AmberBlog

Discussion of all things patent mapping and analytics.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that has been used in the blog.
  • Login

Is the Apple pinch to zoom patent valid? Have the USPTO examiners missed any key patents?

Posted by on
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • 0 Comments
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Leading smartphone wars patent analyst Florian Mueller wrote late last year about Apple's so called 'pinch to zoom' patent, which has been tentatively rejected in the first round of a re-examination process. The patent in question, US7844915, has a listed priority date of January 2007. In his blog, Mueller writes:

  • Apple itself declared it the commercially most valuable one of the three multitouch software patents-in-suit, demanding a per-unit royalty for future (post-judgment) use of $3.10 while the other two software patents-in-suit are each valued at $2.02 per unit. 
  • The prior art references underlying the (rejection on grounds of lack of novelty) is U.S. Patent No, 7,724,242 on a "touch driven method and apparatus to integrate and display multiple image layers forming alternate depictions of same subject matter". It doesn't specifically claim the pinch-to-zoom gesture as far as I can see, but it doesn't have to do that in order to serve as prior art, given that the '915 patent is only about one part (though an essential one) of the internal steps required to make pinch-to-zoom work. The other two prior art references (over the combination of which the '915 patent is deemed obvious) are the publication of a Japanese patent application (Japanese Pub. No. 2000-163031A, "Nomura") and this 1991 paper, entitled "The Automatic Recognition of Gestures" and authored by Dean Harris Rubine (Carnegie Mellon University).

US 7724242, by the way, discloses a pinch to zoom function for a touch sensitive display, whether  using a projector to display an image on the touch sensitive surface as shown in the figure below, or shown using 'thin profile display technologies...such as LCDs....'

 camera_20121221-040705_1.gif

 

But has all the prior art been found? This could be a good test for our new patent searching engine AmberScope.

This time of the year precludes a very elaborate analysis, but we can report from a preliminary evaluation using AmberScope, that the USPTO should add the following patents to the review process:

1) US8086971 Apparatus, Methods and computer program products providing finger-based and hand-based gesture commands for portable electronic device applications to Nokia, which discloses a pinch to zoom gesture (see Figure 8D, discussed in paragraph 46), and has a filing date of June 2006.

Nokia-pinch-to-zoom-example.gif

 

2) US2006/026521 Gestures for touch sensitive input devices to Apple, which extensively discloses a pinch to zoom function, and which has a priority date of July 2004.

pinch-to-zoom-example.gif

Unlike the US 7724242 patent discussed by Mueller, both of these other prior art patents disclose touch sensitive displays for pinch to zoom.

In fact, the US patent office is aware of the Nokia patent (it is listed here), but I could find no reference to the 2006 Apple patent application as being listed prior art to the granted Apple "pinch to zoom" patent. 

Tagged in: apple
Doris Spielthenner developed NPA™ patent analysis after recognising the potential to identify key patents and companies through a systematic analysis of their citation linkages.

Doris has also worked in business relationship analysis for a range of business sectors including the pharmaceutical, law enforcement, and infrastructure tendering in Europe, the United States and Australia. As a pioneer in the field of relationship analysis Doris has published in a number of business journals, including the Pharmaceutical Executive, the Intellectual Property Magazine and Nature Biotechnology. Doris has also invented the concept for a reality TV series, based on social networks which has been shown in Germany and Austria.

Comments

In conjunction with..

griffith hack logo

Exclusive Australian licensee of Ambercite

AmberBlog Tag Cloud

Johnson & Johnson patent examiners patent influence prior art searching IPC patent codes Hybrid car patents tablet patent claims microsoft VirnetX Moneyball Supreme Court j.allard Easai Boehringer Ingelheim subway stations patent thickets power law Technology history patent attorney small inventors patent quality Targeted Tau Protein Patent clusters Graph Search big data CBS Foundation patents Strongest smartphone patents Patent ranking omeprazole ICT patents beta trial Seminar Google maps Ford Sabermetrics samsung patent searching Blue Spike Patent families Network of ideas Intellectual assets Thank You Alzheimer's patents Bellus Health motorola wisdom of crowds backward citations rate of technology change prior art Google glasses Where do ideas come from? swatch patent filing data invention quality patent citations Forward citations Litigation touch free Bayer mining patents patent mapping evergreening Efficient Drivetrain collective intelligence apple smart watch Citations Paice Corporation Marvell graphical interfaces focus patent courier patent portfolio rankings statistics amberscope samsung Toyota patent quality assessment Amyloid protein Denver Pfizer ITC Ruling Elan Vertex Pharmaceuticals patent value distribution patent networks Qualcomm bapineuzumab Merck patent landscaping Godfather IP Patent Analysis webinar Congratulations prediction Most cited Extreme Relatity white space portfolio analytics smartphone patents Teva Pharmaceutical Conference patent data patents patent value AstraZeneca food patents Timeline analysis e-commerce innovation amberscore infringement Smartphone wars patent ownership keywords windows 8 Searching Facebook Presentation Olympic Games Knowledge flow network patent searching google watch Visualization associative searching patent codes Nike GlaxoSmithKline invalidity Network Patent Analysis El Lilly inventors Patent landscape Alzheimer's treatment patents gesture NPA Insight Carnegie Mellon solanezumab Understanding context Sportbrain google patents and society PIUG Surfcast patent validity Search Patent Turnover value of patents White paper Paris patent filing statistics due diligence blackberry